A New Era in Ceramic Archaeometry: A Comprehensive Multimodal Methodological Workflow
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study establishes a comprehensive, sequential multimodal workflow for archaeometric analysis of medieval ceramics, integrating seven measurement techniques to characterize elemental, crystalline, amorphous, microstructural, structural, and chemical-state properties of the material, while preserving artefact integrity. Therefore, (i) X-ray fluorescence establishes baseline major (Si, Al, Fe, Ca, K, Na) and trace (Cr, Mn, Zr) profiles for paste discrimination; (ii) X-ray diffraction identifies kaliophilite/oligoclase phases (~ 800–900°C firing); (iii) Fourier transform infrared resolves amorphous networks (Si–O–Si 950–1100 cm-1); (iv) Raman spectroscopy detects microscale oxide impurities (anatase TiO2 lattice modes at 110–160 cm-1, ZrO2, Al2O3 corundum M–O stretching modes at 440–465 cm-1) and lattice defects, revealing heavy mineral tempers (rutile sands) and refractory phases undetectable by bulk diffraction analysis or the broad spectral envelopes of infrared spectroscopy; (v) scanning electron microscope with energy dispersive spectroscopy quantifies temper distributions; (vi) X-ray computed tomography reveals 3D void networks, and (vii) X-ray absorption near-edge structure constrains speciation of Fe2+/Fe3+, Ca carbonate–silicates, and K-feldspars. This standardized framework enables precise reconstruction of provenance, fluxing strategies, pyrotechnology, and post-firing alterations, beyond the limitations of single- and dual-technique approaches, providing a reproducible protocol for heritage science.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
S. Scarcella, Archaeological Ceramics: A Review of Current Research, BAR Publishing, 2011, https://doi.org/10.30861/9781407307480
S. Dhanapandian, C. Manoharan, P. Sutharsan, Acta Phys. Pol. A 121, 592 (2012), https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.121.592
P. Colomban, A. Slodczyk, Acta Phys. Pol. A 116, 7 (2009), https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.116.7
P. Colomban, G. Simsek Franci, M. Gerken, M. Gironda, V. Mesqui, Ceramics 6, 2178 (2023), https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics6040134
C. Germinario, G. Cultrone, A. De Bonis, F. Izzo, A. Langella, M. Mercurio, L. Nodari, C.R. Vyhnal, C. Grifa, Appl. Clay Sci. 253, 107347 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2024.107347
A. Gianoncelli, S. Schöder, J.R. Plaisier, M. Fugazzotto, G. Barone, A. Russo, P. Mazzoleni, S. Raneri, Heritage 7, 2118 (2024), https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7040100
C.L. Reedy, Appl. Sci. 12, 11448 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3390/app122211448
R. Abdelrahman, S. Wroński, M. Wojenka, J. Tarasiuk, L. Samek, Nukleonika 70, 97 (2025), https://doi.org/10.2478/nuka-2025-0010
N. Henderson, T. Hill, D. Sampson, J. Sedlmair, Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 103, 16 (2024), https://ceramics.org/wp-content/bulletin/2024/articles/F-Henderson/_mar24.pdf
M.S. Rahman, H.S.C. Metselaar, B.B.A. Razak, Mediterr. Archaeol. Archaeom. 24, 38 (2024), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13383260
V. Papakosta, O. Lopez-Costas, S. Isaksson, Archaeometry 62, 677 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12554
D. Bersani, P.P. Lottici, J. Raman Spectrosc. 47, 499 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.4914
C. Riera-Soto, C. Agüero, O. González-Maurel, M. Uribe, A. Menzies, Front. Earth Sci. 10, 807865 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.807865
Z. Li, X. Hu, X. Jiang, J. Cui, Herit. Sci. 12, 1399 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01399-8
GE Sensing & Inspection Technologies phoenix X-ray GmbH, GE Computed Tomography, 2015
L.A. Feldkamp, L.C. Davis, J.W. Kress, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1, 612 (1984), https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.1.000612
Volume Graphics GmbH, VGStudio Max Reference Manual Release 2.0, 2013, https://volumegraphics.hexagon.com/en/products/vgstudio-max.html
J. Szlachetko, J. Szade, E. Beyer et al., Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, 10 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03592-9
J. Hormes, W. Klysubun, J. Göttert et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 489, 76 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2020.12.017
G. Cibin, A. Mottana, A. Marcelli, M.F. Brigatti, Miner. Petrol. 85, 67 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00710-005-0099-z
J. Rajendran, S. Gialanella, P.B. Aswath, Mater. Sci. Eng. C 33, 3968 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.05.038
B. Ravel, Demeter software, https://bruceravel.github.io/demeter/
B. Ravel, M. Newville, J. Synchrotron Rad. 12, 537 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1107/S0909049505012719
F. Berna, A. Behar, R. Shahack-Gross et al., J. Archaeol. Sci. 34, 358 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2006.05.011
S. Shoval, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 42, 175 (1994), https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02546999
S. Shoval, Opt. Mater. 24, 117 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-3467(03)00114-9
R. Ravisankar, A. Naseerutheen, G. Raja Annamalai A. Chandrasekaran, A. Rajalakshmi, K.V. Kanagasabapathy, M.V.R. Prasad, K.K. Satpathy, Spectrochim. Acta A 121, 457 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2013.10.110
G. Pezzotti, A.A. Porporati, J. Biomed. Opt. 9, 372 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1647547
K. Delbé, C. De Sousa, F. Grizet, M. Yahiaoui, Materials 15, 8645 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238645
V.V. Pushkarev, V.I. Kovalchuk, J.L. D'Itri, J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 5341 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0311254
P. Colomban, Appl. Phys. A 79, 167 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-004-2512-6