Using the Automatic Calibration Machine MagStressACS to Establish Calibration Curves for S355 Steel

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Dec 31, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.146.778
Keywords:
Barkhausen effect, calibration process, calibration curves, S355 steel

Main Article Content

Z. Saternus
Czestochowa University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Dąbrowskiego 69, 42-201 Częstochowa, Poland
T. Domański
Czestochowa University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Dąbrowskiego 69, 42-201 Częstochowa, Poland
M. Kubiak
Czestochowa University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Dąbrowskiego 69, 42-201 Częstochowa, Poland

Abstract

The paper presents physical aspects related to the preparation of the device and the cross-sample calibration process. The innovative automatic calibration machine MagStressACS was used to carry out the process. This device is an effective solution for quickly generating calibration curves of the dependence of the Barkhausen effect on the strain state for the biaxial stress state. A cross-calibration sample made of S355 steel was used in the tests. During the calibration process, 50 measurement points were assumed. Based on the experimental tests, calibration curves and two-dimensional calibration maps were obtained. The results constitute a basis for reference results for further research on the stress state and deformation of real steel constructions.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
Z. Saternus, T. Domański, and M. Kubiak, “Using the Automatic Calibration Machine MagStressACS to Establish Calibration Curves for S355 Steel”, Acta Phys. Pol. A, vol. 146, no. 6, p. 778, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.146.778.
Issue
Vol. 146 No. 6 (2024): Proceedings of the 29th Polish–Slovak Scientific Conference on Machine Modelling and Simulations 2024 (MMS 2024), pp. 737-834
Section
Special segment
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

X. Li, J. Liu, H. Wu, K. Miao, H. Wu, R. Li, C. Liu, W. Fang, Heliyon 10, e28348 (2024)

M.E. Turan, F. Aydin, Y. Sun, M. Cetin, Eng Fail. Anal. 96, 525 (2019)

J. Lu, Handbook of Measurement of Residual Stresses, Fairmont Press, USA, 1996

M. Hayama, S. Kikuchi, M. Tsukahara, Y. Misaka, J. Komotori, Int. J. Fatigue 178, 107989 (2024)

R.P.S. Sisodia, M. Gáspár, M. Sepsi, V. Mertinger, Data in Brief 38, 107341 (2021)

N.S. Suhaimi, M.I.M. Ahmad, M.Z. Nuawi, A.K. Ariffin, A.Z.M. Abdullah, Results in Engineering 19, 101300 (2023)

J.M. Sablik, M.Q. Smith, C.J. Waldhart, D.A. McKee, B. Augustyniak, J. Appl. Phys. 84, 6239 (1998)

MagStress5c — NNT

M. Chmielewski, L. Piotrowski, J. Elect. Eng. 69, 497 (2018)

M. Chmielewski, L. Piotrowski, B. Augustyniak, Meas. Sci. Technol. 28, 045903 (2017)

S. Santa-aho, A. Sorsa, M. Hakanen, K. Leiviskä, M. Vippola, T. Lepistö, Meas. Sci. Technol. 25, 085602 (2014)

M. Lindgren, T. Lepisto, Mater. Sci. Tech. 18, 1369 (2002)

M. Kubiak, Z. Saternus, T. Domański, W. Piekarska, Materials 17, 2364 (2024)