Hysteresis and Excess Power Loss Components Properties in Grain-Oriented Electrical Sheets

Main Article Content

W. Pluta

Abstract

The most popular loss model for electrical steel sheets is the three-component model, which divides the specific total loss into hysteresis, classical eddy current, and excess components. The latter component is defined as the difference between the measured loss and the loss calculated using Maxwell's equations. The origin of the excess component has been a subject of debate for many years. Initially, it was associated with hysteresis loss and later with micro-eddy currents. Furthermore, the interdependence of the components complicates their modeling. This paper presents the results of research and analysis of loss components for the three-component model, taking into account the phenomenon of magnetic anisotropy. The studies were conducted on samples of conventional grain-oriented electrical steel sheet for several selected magnetization directions. The results indicate a correlation between the hysteresis and excess components for different magnetization directions. The paper proposes combining both components in a loss model for electrical sheets.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
W. Pluta, “Hysteresis and Excess Power Loss Components Properties in Grain-Oriented Electrical Sheets”, Acta Phys. Pol. A, vol. 149, no. 3, p. S145, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.149.S145.
Section
Special segment

References

G. Mörée, M. Leijon, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 609, 172163 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2024.172163

G. Bertotti, Hysteresis in Magnetism, Academic Press, San Diego 1998, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-093270-2.X5048-X

F. Brailsford, Physical Principles of Magnetism, D. Van Nostrand Company LTD, London 1966

N.F. Astbury, Industrial Magnetic Testing, The Institute of Physics, London 1952

R.M. Bozorth, Ferromagnetism, IEEE Press, New York 1993

F. Fiorillo, Measurement and Characterization of Magnetic Materials, North-Holland, Amsterdam 2004, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-257251-7.X5000-X

K. Matsumura, R. Fukuda, IEEE Trans. Magn. 20, 1533 (1984), https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.1984.1063223

D. Snell, J. Homewood, R. Taylor, J. Phys. IV France 08, Pr2-547 (1998), https://doi.org/10.1051/jp4:19982127

K. Ścibisz, J. Krawczyk, Arch. Metall. Mater. 69, 381 (2024), https://doi.org/10.24425/amm.2024.149105

W.A. Pluta, IEEE Trans. Magnetics 52, 6300912 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2015.2496547

W.A. Pluta, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 499, 166270 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.166270

W.A. Pluta, Przegląd Elektrotechniczny 2018, 102 (2018), https://doi.org/10.15199/48.2018.02.24

W.A. Pluta, A.J. Moses, Phys. B Condensed Matter 544, 28 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2018.05.018

Y. Chen, P. Pillay, in: Conf. Record of the 2002 IEEE Industry Applications Conf. 37th IAS Annual Meeting, IEEE, 2002 p.759, https://doi.org/10.1109/IAS.2002.1042645

A. Hubert, R. Schäfer, Magnetic Domains: The Analysis of Magnetic Microstructures, Springer-Verlag, New York (NY) 2009, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85054-0

R. Gaylord, C.D. Graham, Jr., IEEE Trans. Magn. 19, 2016 (1983), https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.1983.1062615

A.J. Moses, Scr. Mater. 67, 560 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.02.027

H. Pfützner, Arch. Elektrotech. 60, 177 (1978) (in German), https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01578992

H. Winner, W. Naber, R. Sanded, W. Grosse-Nobis, Phys. Scr. 39, 666 (1989), https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/39/5/028

M. Birsan, J.A. Szpunar, T.W. Krause, D.L. Atherton, IEEE Trans. Magn. 32, 527 (1996), https://doi.org/10.1109/20.486543

G. Bertotti, J. Phys. Colloq. 46, C6-389 (1985), https://doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:1985672