Oxygen and Nitrogen Substitution in Plutonium Carbide

Main Article Content

C. Zuo
J.Y. Bao
R. Yang
S.C. Li

Abstract

 Plutonium carbide, a promising nuclear fuel, undergoes chemical aging associated with oxygen and nitrogen anion substitution. The correlations between anion incorporation and the resulting electronic and optical evolution — particularly regarding nitrogen doping — remain incompletely understood. Systematic first-principles calculations are conducted on pristine PuC, PuC0.75O0.25, and PuC0.75N0.25, covering structural, magnetic, electronic, and optical properties, as well as defect formation energies. Both dopants preserve PuC's antiferromagnetic ground state, inducing slight lattice expansions of 0.2% and 0.14% for O and N, respectively. Nitrogen weakly perturbs Pu 5f states, retaining a three-peak structure near the Fermi level with marginal charge redistribution. Oxygen, in contrast, collapses the triple-peak feature into a single broad band, suppresses the Fermi-level density of states, and drives pronounced  Pu→O charge transfer, enhancing 5f localization via strong orbital hybridization. These electronic variations directly manifest in the optical response. Oxygen doping drastically lifts the zero-frequency dielectric constant from 133.0 to 395.3 and amplifies low-energy absorption, while  nitrogen  induces  only  subtle  spectral  changes. Both substitutions  are  exothermic  under carbon-rich conditions, with O (-5.10 eV)  being  thermodynamically more  favorable than N (-4.92 eV), consistent with the trend in dopant electronegativity. This work builds a consistent thermodynamic–electronic–optical correlation, offering distinct optical fingerprints as a sensitive non-destructive probe for PuC aging evaluation.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
C. Zuo, J. Bao, R. Yang, and S. Li, “Oxygen and Nitrogen Substitution in Plutonium Carbide”, Acta Phys. Pol. A, vol. 149, no. 6, p. 216, Oct. 2026, doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.149.216.
Section
Regular segment

References

N.G. Cooper, Challenges in Plutonium Science, Vol. I, Los Alamos Sience, Los Alamos (NM) 2000

J.C. Martz, A.J. Schwartz, JOM 55, 19 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-003-0023-0

D.C. Hoffman, Advances in Plutonium Chemistry 1967-2000, American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park (IL) 2002

L.R. Morss, N.M. Edelstein, J. Fuger, The Chemistry of the Actinide and Transactinide Elements, Springer, Dordrecht (The Netherlands) 2006, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0211-0

C. Ganguly, D. Vollath, Quantitative Phase Analysis in the U, Pu-C-System by X-Ray Diffraction, KfK, Karlsruhe (Germany) 1974

R. Lorenzelli, Contribution a L'etude Du Systeme (U,Pu)C,N, CEA-R-3536, CEA, Fontenay-aux-Roses (France) 1968 (in French)

R.C. Sherriff, The Sintering of Uranium-Plutonium Carbonitrides, ProQuest LLC, 2018

U. Benedict, C. Dufour, O. Scholten, J. Nucl. Mater. 73, 208 (1978), https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3115(78)90562-7

R. Qiu, J. Tang, J. Chen, P. Liu, Q. Wang, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 26, 14122 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1039/d3cp05249d

R. Yang, Z. Zhang, B. Tang, RSC Adv. 15, 48296 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ra06402c

B. Ao, R. Qiu, H. Lu, X. Ye, P. Shi, P. Chen, X. Wang, J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 101 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5097794

X.-D. Wen, R.L. Martin, G.E. Scueria, S.P. Rudin, E.R. Batista, J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 13122 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1021/jp403141t

B. Sun, P. Zhang, X.-G. Zhao, J. Chem. Phys 128, 084705 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2833553

G. Kresse, J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558

P.E. Blöchl, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953

S.H. Vosko, L. Wilk, M. Nusair, Can. J. Phys 58, 1200 (1980), https://doi.org/10.1139/p80-159

A.I. Liechtenstein, V.I. Anisimov, J. Zaanen, Phys. Rev. B 52, 5467 (1995), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.52.R5467

J.P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett 77, 3865 (1996), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

J.L. Green, G.P. Arnold, J.A. Leary, N.G. Nereson, J. Nucl. Mater 34, 281 (1970), https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3115(70)90194-7

M. Gajdoš, K. Hummer, G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, F. Bechstedt, Phys. Rev. B 73, 045112 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.045112

F. Wooten, Optical Properties of Solids, Academic Press, New York 1972

L. Petit, A. Savane, Z. Szotek, W.M. Temmerman, G.M. Stoks, Phys. Rev. B. 80, 045124 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.045124

W. Tang, E. Sanville, G. Henkelman, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 084204 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/21/8/084204

M.H. Rand, T.L. Markin, Thermodynamics of Nuclear Materials, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna 1968